For those of you who have better things to do than spend all day Twittering, allow me to fill you in on the recent debate that has been raging on the micro blogging site.

In a nutshell, we have pretty much received a slating from many of the copywriters we had the sheer audacity to invite to join us. Their argument, that we are undermining them by charging much less than they do is understandable, if not exactly impartial.

So in the interests of a fair and open approach we’ve decided to lift the lid on this and let people make up their own minds. Thanks to Andrew Nattan at Unmemorable Title who has done a pretty good job of collating all of the arguments. You can read this here.

The Twitterings have ranged from the good:

EpigramCopy “@copify Nice website folks. Good look and a good service”

The bad:

Copymonkeybiz @ Copify “me and I earned 14 quid today for something I thought was rather good.” (No? Me either.)

And the just plain ugly…

judycopywriter:@copify @Mr603 @NoSloppyCopy I can type ‘sh*t’ 500 times in an hour. Does this make me a pro? (‘Bloodsuckers’ takes a little longer). 5:21 PM Feb 4th*

And this from the so-called professionals!

Follow us @ http://www.twitter.com/copify.

Martin