Debunking the myths about ‘content mills’

The best of times, the worst of times for copywriters

The best of times, the worst of times for copywriters

I’ve worked in the copywriting industry for a little over 5 years now. I’ve been a staffer at several online marketing agencies, a freelance copywriter, a contractor, and in my last full-time role, the SEO content guy for a retailer. I’ve earned very good rates and I’ve also earned peanuts. I’d like to think that I’ve learned a thing or two along the way…

These days, when I’m not badger baiting or seal clubbing, I help to run what is known by some people as a ‘content mill’.

What is a ‘content mill’?

Coming From The Mill - L.S Lowry

Coming From The Mill – L.S Lowry

The term ‘content mill’ was originally used to describe companies like Demand Media, who churn out high volumes of content based on common search engine queries such as: “How do I tie my shoelaces?” These pages are monetised by Google Adsense and other forms of advertising.

We’re not a publisher of this type of content, or a supplier for that matter, but somehow we managed to get tarred with the same brush.

Content mills polarise opinion. Some people love them, others, like the newly-formed Professional Copywriters’ Network, think that they’re exploitative and even immoral. I’m hopefully going to debunk some of the myths that surround them.

There isn’t a need for content mills

Been scraping? You will get Googlewhacked

Been scraping? You will get Googlewhacked

Take the following scenario – you run an ecommerce business selling central heating systems. Because you’ve nicked all of the copy on your pages from your manufacturer’s websites you’ve been Googlewhacked. Your site isn’t getting any traffic, which means you aren’t making any money, so you need to get tens of thousands of product descriptions on your site re-written, and you need it done yesterday.

So where do you go? If you talk to a freelance copywriter, they’ll probably tell you that they might be able to start in a few weeks and it will take about 7 years for them to complete the lot.

You might go to a traditional copywriting agency, but even if they’ve got an in-house team of let’s say more than 10 (unlikely) it will take them several months to complete, and at an hourly rate of £100 it’ll cost you more than your annual turnover. You’re going to have to shift a lot of boilers to see any ROI.

Thanks to Uncle Google, we are getting loads of requests like this at the moment and as far as I can see, content mills are the only businesses that are able to service them.

Content mills are cheap

Copify is cheap in comparison to the rate card championed by the Professional Copywriters’ Network, but then these prices have been drawn up by people who are living in a dream world.

Hands up if you think this is reasonable. Anybody?

Hands up if you think this is reasonable. Anybody?

When deciding on our prices we examined the marketplace to come up with rates that would allow us to pay our writers a fair amount and make a decent profit margin, without (and this is the key) being prohibitively expensive for our customers.

We’re not the cheapest content mill around, nor the most expensive. In this list, compiled by Tom Critchlow, we are classed as ‘mid-range.’ Tom is head of search marketing at Distilled, one of the most respected SEO agencies in the world, so I think this speaks volumes about attitudes within the industry towards pricing.

The ‘per word’ model doesn’t work

Some copywriters argue that charging per word is wrong, but they’re not looking at it from a client’s perspective. There is a good reason why we chose this model, and it’s because our customers like to know what they are getting up front. They aren’t willing to pay for an indeterminate amount of words.

A lot of our customers, particularly in the SEO community, like to stick rigidly to a certain number of words on a page as they belief that this will help them to rank higher. It’s a simple principle, lots of words = lots of information = better content. As with ‘keyword density’, I believe that this is hokum, but I’m more than happy to service the demand. Who am I to tell them that they are wrong? If you want to run a successful business, you have to live by the principle that the customer is ALWAYS right.

Content mills produce low quality content

Member of the Professional Copywriters' Network?

Lots of people have claimed that content mills produce inferior, shoddy or low quality content, but I’m yet to read a negative review from someone who is completely impartial on the subject.

Our neighbours at NuBlue completed a comprehensive review of copy delivered by us, other content mills and a freelance copywriter. If you read this, you’ll see that it’s pretty objective, but of course being in the same building as us, certain people raised questions about conflicts of interest.

So we conducted a blind test on our own blog and the consensus was that the £15 Copify-written piece was better than than the £150 piece from a freelance copywriter.

Copywriting agencies aren’t bothered by content mills

Bothered?

Bothered?

The Professional Copywriters’ Network claims that they ‘aren’t too bothered‘ about content mills, which I’d believe, had the founders not spent the last 2 years trolling us and then launching a site to deal with the threat.

A lady who runs a well-known copywriting agency in London recently told me that she was ‘horrified’ by our business, and she’s right to be. The last time I saw a quote from her firm, it was for twice as much as the nearest competitor (we’re talking six figures here). Guess who won the contract?

 

‘Professional’ copywriters don’t work for content mills

We’ve got just over 300 writers, among them qualified journalists, marketing professionals, novelists and graduates of prestigious universities like Oxford and Cambridge. Several of them are even members of the Professional Copywriters’ Network :-)

Most of our writers use the site to supplement their income from full time jobs or other copywriting projects. Why do they work for us?

  • They don’t have to prospect or pitch for work.
  • Jobs are there for them if and when they want them.
  • They don’t have to send out invoices that never get paid.

They’re happy, we’re happy, our customers are happy.

meetings are toxic

Meetings are toxic

You need to have meetings

If you want some copy, give a copywriter a brief detailing your requirements. This should include guidelines on the audience, purpose and style of the piece. The more detail you can provide, the better the outcome.

You don’t need to have a meeting. Some copywriters will tell you that you do, but bear in mind that they are probably billing you for the time.

Content mills exploit copywriters

Like most copywriters, I didn’t grow up with dreams of writing about laminate flooring or central heating, copywriting was something I fell into. I wanted to be a journalist, but I hadn’t bargained on how competitive it would be. When I graduated from University I begged the editor of my local rag to let me do some work experience, I even wrote a piece that they published, but they still wouldn’t let me. So I became a copywriter instead, but I still had to work for nothing for several months before I got my first paid gig.

Michael O'Leary

“If this is such a Siberian salt mine and I am such an ogre, then why are they still working?

Copify gives talented graduates the opportunity to build a portfolio and gain some valuable experience. They get paid to do it. 5 years ago, I’d have given my left arm for that sort of opportunity. We’re also giving established writers the chance to earn money by writing as and when they need it.

We have never claimed that we are offering people a living wage, but I can tell you that we have several writers who have regularly withdrawn a 4 figure sum from the site in a month. That’s a healthy contribution to anybody’s income.

Yes we take a cut, and yes we make a profit, but we’re not exactly dot com millionaires.

being cynical is easy

Being cynical is easy

It’s easy to be cynical about it, but I don’t see the founders of the Professional Copywriters’ Network doing anything to really help anybody but themselves.

Getting real

The demand for content mills reflects the priorities of our customers, namely cost, speed and scale. Usually in that order. If you don’t listen to your customers you will struggle at the best of times, but in a recession, you will die.

I think our argument can be summed up neatly by a conversation I had with a potential client a few weeks ago. He needed thousands of pages of duplicate content rewriting as soon as possible. We quoted for the work but we were turned down in favour of another supplier who agreed to take on the job for a quarter of our price. That’s £0.0075 (three quarters of a penny) per word. You guessed it, he sells boilers. I wished him good luck and told him that if he ever wanted to do it properly, he knew where to find me.

For what it’s worth, I really like the concept of the Professional Copywriters’ Network. The copywriter in me is rooting for them, but until they get real about pricing and the state of the market, I can’t see them doing much more than massaging their own egos.

Copify has been trading for just over 2 and a half years now. In that time we have supplied over 3.2 million words of copy to over 300 customers. Surely we must be doing something right?

Post to Twitter

Is it time for SEO agencies to start taking copywriting seriously?

Google’s recent algorithm updates are increasingly penalising sites with little or no unique content. Could this mean that SEO agencies will finally start to realise the value and importance of copy as part of their campaigns?

Peggy Olson

Undervalued - The life of an SEO copywriter

Econsultancy’s 2012 SEO agencies buyers guide reveals that most firms have little to say about copywriting. Of the 36 agencies surveyed, 100% claimed that they offer copywriting as a service to their clients. However, only 8 (22%) revealed any specific information on the subject and just 6 (17%) revealed that they have dedicated in-house SEO copywriting resource.

The individual responses range from the comprehensive:

“Copy writing services we offer include copy writing for sales based and information based pages, meta descriptions and external content for syndication. All of the copywriting carried out is completed internally rather than being outsourced. Where clients do not require Summit’s copywriting service, we provide guidelines of how both web site and external content should be written from a search engine and user perspective.” – Summit Media

“Stickyeyes has its own multi-lingual content team, comprising journalists and copywriters, who create and publish all content in-house.”  – Stickyeyes

To the noncommittal:

“Content marketing for online channels, rather than sales copywriting”Vertical Leap

“Sometimes – More consultancy based”iSpy Marketing

The story so far…

When I started working as a copywriter around 5 years ago, the first 2 jobs I held were at SEO agencies who had previously outsourced work to India. This ‘filler’ copy served the purposes of Google’s primitive algorithm, but not the needs of clients, who were understandably peeved about paying agency rates for copy that didn’t even make sense, let alone reflect their products and services in a particularly good light. There was a need for copy that read well, even if most of it was never actually read, and that’s where people like me came in.

Then Google began unleashing its pack of wild, game-changing animals. First came Panda, seeing off the ‘content farms’ and now Penguin, taking down sites which have been over-optimised by keyword stuffing or suspect links. A job lot of directory and ezine article submissions every month just won’t cut it any more. It’s now about obtaining those valuable, below the radar links, that only come from copy that people actually want to read.

Google animals

Google's game-changing algorithm updates

So why do so many SEO agencies shy away from copywriting?

It’s difficult – Finding good copywriters is tough. Finding copywriters with a basic grasp of SEO principles is even more challenging. Add to the mix a list of uninspiring client keywords, and it’s not hard to see why agencies don’t want to get involved with content production.

It’s frustrating – Many agency clients (particularly big ones) have lengthy and complex sign-off procedures. There’s nothing worse than writing a killer piece of content, only to have it trashed by a finicky brand manager.

It’s time consuming – Writing great copy takes time and when you’re a staffer filling in an agency timesheet, trying to justify more than 1 hour per piece of content can be a hard sell to your line manager, even if that extra bit of time could pay dividends in terms of those all-important shares, tweets and likes.

It’s hard to measure – Thrown in with the hundreds of other factors that can influence an SEO campaign, measuring the impact of content can be incredibly difficult.

It’s misguided – Believe it or not, there are actually people out there who believe that ‘keyword density’ still has an impact on rankings. Another mistake that many companies are guilty of is making a distinction between ‘SEO’ copy and their regular sales copy. The two should NEVER be mutually exclusive.

Conclusion

Google isn’t advanced enough to read copy like a human, yet. But it is surely only a matter of time. SEO agencies need to recognise this, and start treating copy as an opportunity, rather than an inconvenience.

Post to Twitter